Human Computer Interaction, as the word suggests is about the series of events between man and the machine and how the machine interprets the implementation of the design incorporated in it for evaluation purposes. It can just be simply explained as the phenomenon of interactive computing with a view to evaluate.

There is just yet, not agreed definition about the same because of the amount of area’s included in these interactions. We do not have characteristics of these interactions, therefore, we do not have a target to concrete. But the definition mentioned above gives us a direction to think and work in.

There are many perspectives we can think in, primarily:
1) Giving humans more importance
2) Giving Computers more importance
3) Giving both equal amount of importance

Now, from a perspective of giving humans more importance, it would be essentially evaluating how the computer reacts to a set or concepts (programs) from one or more individuals. An example of the same would be an interactive question answer session, based on the software it runs from or a set of graphics. The results of the same may vary from person to person, but what it gives us out of it is, the interactive result and a rich varied amount of topics which could be included in the human-computer interaction.

Looking at it from the perspective of giving a machine more importance, computers instead of being desktops, laptops or palmtops, they would rather be treated as conceptual computation machines, such as important parts of complex machines like spacecraft controlling centers, military control bases etc.

The human and computer interactions are important to understand because we are trying to make a machine behave like a human, because designing these interfaces, establishes a relationship to profitable create together a platform to work on. We can, therefore, decipher the basis of the interaction as profitable.

Keeping in mind that we are trying to replicate the complex working of our thought, into a machine, which would essentially perform the task of a numerous amount of humans would, we need to understand the margins of it. A hammer in general would not be counted as a Human Computer Interaction but it would rather be taken as a tool, which stresses more on Human interaction. Computation to produce a result, which humans would agree on by analysis, would be taken as Human Computer Interaction.

Human Computer Interaction, as the word suggests is about the series of events between man and the machine and how the machine interprets the implementation of the design incorporated in it for evaluation purposes. It can just be simply explained as the phenomenon of interactive computing with a view to evaluate.

There is just yet, not agreed definition about the same because of the amount of area’s included in these interactions. We do not have characteristics of these interactions, therefore, we do not have a target to concrete. But the definition mentioned above gives us a direction to think and work in.

There are many perspectives we can think in, primarily:
1) Giving humans more importance
2) Giving Computers more importance
3) Giving both equal amount of importance

Now, from a perspective of giving humans more importance, it would be essentially evaluating how the computer reacts to a set or concepts (programs) from one or more individuals. An example of the same would be an interactive question answer session, based on the software it runs from or a set of graphics. The results of the same may vary from person to person, but what it gives us out of it is, the interactive result and a rich varied amount of topics which could be included in the human-computer interaction.

Looking at it from the perspective of giving a machine more importance, computers instead of being desktops, laptops or palmtops, they would rather be treated as conceptual computation machines, such as important parts of complex machines like spacecraft controlling centers, military control bases etc.

The human and computer interactions are important to understand because we are trying to make a machine behave like a human, because designing these interfaces, establishes a relationship to profitable create together a platform to work on. We can, therefore, decipher the basis of the interaction as profitable.

Keeping in mind that we are trying to replicate the complex working of our thought, into a machine, which would essentially perform the task of a numerous amount of humans would, we need to understand the margins of it. A hammer in general would not be counted as a Human Computer Interaction but it would rather be taken as a tool, which stresses more on Human interaction. Computation to produce a result, which humans would agree on by analysis, would be taken as Human Computer Interaction.